Ease My PrepEase My Prep
All Articles
GeneralThe HinduEditorial7 July 2026

Bad for both: On the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Practice PYQs on this topic

500+ questions on General with explanations

Open App

๐Ÿ“Œ Summary:

  • Context: more than four years into Russia's invasion (begun February 2022), Ukraine is raising the war's cost for the Kremlin โ€” striking Russian energy infrastructure with drones and imposing a drone blockade on Crimea (annexed by Russia in 2014), forcing a state of emergency there

  • Core argument: the war is a strategic stalemate that is "bad for both" โ€” neither side has a viable military path to its objectives, so both must accept mutual concessions, a ceasefire and substantive negotiations

  • How Ukraine's strategy evolved: initial battlefield resistance plus mobilising international support โ†’ advanced Western defensive/offensive weapons โ†’ hundreds of drones launched daily at Russian troops and critical infrastructure; strikes on oil facilities โ€” called "long-range sanctions" by President Zelenskyy โ€” knocked out part of Russia's refining capacity

  • Why pressure has not worked: sweeping Western sanctions and weapons did not slow Russia, which reinforced front lines and captured more territory โ€” last week Russia announced the capture of Kostiantynivka and is closing in on Lyman; Russia now controls over 20% of Ukraine (since 2014)

  • Costs on both sides: tens of thousands of casualties each; Ukraine's economy is heavily dependent on Western aid; for Putin โ€” who initially shielded the Russian public from the war โ€” drone strikes are a stark reminder that the war has come home; Russia faces attacks on a scale unseen since the Second World War

  • Escalation risk: Russia accuses NATO countries of enabling deep strikes; nationalist voices urge Putin to widen the conflict against NATO; the situation is highly volatile with no political settlement in sight

  • Solution proposed: Putin and Zelenskyy should adopt accommodative positions with mutual concessions โ€” agree to a ceasefire and begin substantive negotiations covering both countries' security concerns and the future of NATO

๐ŸŽฏ UPSC Relevance: GS2 International Relations โ€” Russia-Ukraine war trajectory, drone warfare and escalation dynamics, NATO factor, implications for India's strategic autonomy and energy security

๐Ÿ“ Prelims Facts:

  • Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022; Crimea was annexed in 2014

  • Russia currently controls over 20% of Ukrainian territory; recent captures: Kostiantynivka (east), advancing on Lyman

๐Ÿ”‘ Key Term: "Long-range sanctions" โ€” Zelenskyy's term for Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian oil refineries and energy infrastructure, designed to impose economic costs beyond the battlefield

Russia-Ukraine wardrone warfareNATOceasefireCrimea

UPSC Classification

Mains
Mains

See PYQs related to โ€œINTERNATIONAL RELATIONSโ€

Every classification tag above links to actual UPSC questions asked on that topic โ€” with answer, explanation and elimination logic. Only in the app.

Download App