All Articles Open App Download App
PolityThe HinduEditorial2 July 2026
Yes and no: On the erosion of India grassroots democracy
Practice PYQs on this topic
500+ questions on Polity with explanations
๐ Summary:
- Context: A new report based on Rural Development Ministry surveys offers rare data on the erosion of grassroots democracy and low participation in gram sabhas
- Core argument: The state frames the problem as "participation fatigue"/lack of vibrancy, but its remedies (more meetings, more oversight, apps) will further alienate the rural working class; the real issue is the structural disempowerment of gram sabhas and denial of their right to say "no"
- Causal chain โ why participation is collapsing: (1) The 73rd Amendment empowers gram sabhas, but governments have reduced them to clearinghouses for central/State schemes โ no real decision power โ citizens disengage (2) The report pushes the NIRNAY app and real-time uploading of minutes โ panchayat secretaries get less time to facilitate discussion; weak oversight lets officials deny MGNREGA demands as "not entered in the system" (3) Livelihood precarity (over half the barriers to participation are livelihood-related) keeps rural labour away โ gram sabhas become a "playground for the leisured elite" (landlords, contractors), as attendance is not treated as paid social protection (4) Fiscal disempowerment: gram panchayats are constrained from raising their own taxes and depend on grants; 14th and 15th Finance Commission grants tie panchayat spending to central priorities (Jal Jeevan Mission, Swachh Bharat) โ no incentive to attend when funds are earmarked by Delhi (5) In PESA/Scheduled Areas, gram sabhas have the right to prior informed consent over land acquisition and mining, but the state bypasses them or uses "low participation" to manufacture consent (e.g., Hasdeo Arand protests)
- Key data: 18%-28% of respondents cite lack of outcomes for low interest; gram sabhas spend 13% of time identifying local issues but only 4% on revenue generation
- Solutions implied: restore genuine powers and untied funds to gram sabhas; institutionalise attendance as a paid component of social protection; allow local taxation; and honour the right to say "no" under PESA and forest rights
๐ฏ UPSC Relevance: GS2 (Polity โ federalism, local self-government, 73rd Amendment, PESA) โ devolution of the 3Fs (functions, funds, functionaries) and participatory democracy.
๐ Prelims Facts:
- 73rd Constitution Amendment Act (1992) gave constitutional status to Panchayati Raj; gram sabha is the assembly of all registered voters of a village
- PESA Act, 1996 extends Part IX to Fifth Schedule (Scheduled) Areas and empowers gram sabhas on land and minor resources
- 14th & 15th Finance Commissions provide grants to local bodies, largely tied to basic services
๐ Key Term: Gram Sabha โ the body of all registered voters of a village panchayat area; the primary institution of direct, participatory democracy under Part IX of the Constitution.
gram sabha73rd AmendmentPESApanchayati rajdecentralisation
UPSC Classification
Prelims (GS1)
PrelimsMains
See PYQs related to โPolityโ
Every classification tag above links to actual UPSC questions asked on that topic โ with answer, explanation and elimination logic. Only in the app.