Ease My PrepEase My Prep
All Articles
PolityIndian ExpressEditorial29 May 2026

EC has a lot to answer but SC gives it a free pass โ€” and more

Practice PYQs on this topic

500+ questions on Polity with explanations

Open App

๐Ÿ“Œ Summary:

  • Context: SC ruling on petitions challenging the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls (Bihar, then West Bengal)
  • Core argument: SC failed to scrutinise EC's conduct of SIR and instead handed it a "free pass" with unfettered procedural latitude โ€” even on the politically sensitive citizenship question
  • Why SIR is needed (the uncontested part): Periodic clean-up of rolls is necessary because of large-scale migration, rapid urbanisation, illegal cross-border movement, non-reporting of deaths, duplication of entries
  • Causal chain of disenfranchisement: (1) EC shifted burden of proof onto vulnerable voters (poor, migrants, women without paperwork) (2) Onerous documentation regime โ€” voters must produce documents not previously required (3) Compressed timelines for the voter, but no timelines for the appellate process (4) Net effect: ~27 lakh voters disenfranchised in West Bengal
  • The citizenship overreach: SC said EC can do a "limited enquiry" for inclusion in rolls โ€” not a citizenship determination, which lies with "Competent Authority under the Citizenship Act". But the same ruling directs that if EC "is not satisfied" a person meets the statutory conditions, EC must refer the case to the Competent Authority within 4 weeks โ€” effectively, EC sets the stage for a citizenship test through the back door
  • Solutions/recommendations: Court should impose timelines on appellate process; burden of proof should remain with the State, not the voter; EC must publish methodology and disenfranchisement data before any further roll-out

๐ŸŽฏ UPSC Relevance: GS2 Polity โ€” EC's constitutional mandate (Art. 324), separation of powers, judicial review of EC actions, balance between electoral integrity and voter inclusion, RPA 1950/1951, Citizenship Act 1955.

๐Ÿ“ Prelims Facts:

  • Special Intensive Revision (SIR) โ€” distinct from Summary and Intensive Revisions; conducted under Section 21 of RPA, 1950
  • Article 324 โ€” vests superintendence, direction & control of elections in EC
  • Competent Authority under Citizenship Act, 1955 โ€” refers to Foreigners Tribunals / District Magistrates depending on context
  • ~27 lakh โ€” voters reportedly disenfranchised in West Bengal SIR

๐Ÿ”‘ Key Term: Disenfranchisement โ€” formal removal of a person's right to vote, typically through deletion of name from the electoral roll. Concern: the SIR shifts the default from inclusion to exclusion.

ECSIRSC rulingdisenfranchisementRPA

UPSC Classification

Mains

See PYQs related to โ€œPolityโ€

Every classification tag above links to actual UPSC questions asked on that topic โ€” with answer, explanation and elimination logic. Only in the app.

Download App