West Asia crisis opens space for fertiliser policy reform
Practice PYQs on this topic
500+ questions on Economy with explanations
๐ Summary:
-
Context: PM Modi has called on Indian farmers to cut chemical fertiliser consumption by half and move towards "natural farming"
-
Core argument: Editorial says the call may not be practical in current form, but the underlying intent โ curbing demand and promoting judicious use โ is sensible; the West Asia crisis creates a critical reform window
-
Causal chain โ why the West Asia / Strait of Hormuz crisis is a fertiliser shock: (1) Fertilisers supply N, P, K, S nutrients essential for crop yields; India has very little natural gas (urea feedstock), almost no rock phosphate, potash or elemental sulphur reserves (2) India is therefore heavily import-dependent for fertilisers and feedstock (3) Up to 30% of global fertiliser trade passed through the now-disrupted Strait of Hormuz โ squeezing supply and raising prices (4) Successive governments have not only subsidised fertilisers (heavy foreign-exchange outflow) but also encouraged overuse of high-analysis products like urea (5) Result: skewed NPK ratio, soil degradation, fiscal stress, environmental harm
-
Key data:
- Up to 30% of global fertiliser trade transited the Strait of Hormuz until recently
- Only a fraction of applied urea is absorbed by plants; the rest is lost via ammonia volatilisation or nitrate leaching to groundwater, polluting aquifers
-
Solutions proposed: (1) Free or raise retail fertiliser prices to import-parity levels (2) Replace the existing product-wise subsidy regime with a per-acre direct payment (e.g. โน5,000/acre) to all cultivating farmers (3) Combine savings from fertiliser subsidy with PM-Kisan into a unified direct income support scheme (4) Encourage efficient nutrient products and balanced NPK use over urea-only overuse
-
Concluding takeaway: The crisis has made the current subsidy + price-control regime "fiscally and physically unsustainable" โ when product availability is itself a problem, how much can the State subsidise?
๐ฏ UPSC Relevance: GS3 Indian Economy โ Agriculture (fertiliser policy, subsidies, DBT, soil health); GS3 Energy (gas-based feedstock dependence); GS2 Governance (welfare reform via DBT).
๐ Prelims Facts:
- Urea is sold at a Maximum Retail Price (MRP) fixed by GoI โ currently ~โน266.50 per 45 kg bag (heavily subsidised)
- DAP and other P&K fertilisers are under Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) since 2010
- Ideal NPK use ratio is 4:2:1; India''s actual ratio is often skewed worse than 6:2.4:1
- PM-Kisan provides โน6,000/year DBT to landholding farmers (3 instalments of โน2,000)
- Strait of Hormuz handles ~30% of global fertiliser trade, ~20% of global oil, ~30% of global LNG
๐ Key Term: Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) โ A subsidy system in place since 2010 for P and K fertilisers where a fixed per-kg subsidy is paid based on nutrient content; urea is outside NBS and remains under MRP control.
UPSC Classification
See PYQs related to โEconomyโ
Every classification tag above links to actual UPSC questions asked on that topic โ with answer, explanation and elimination logic. Only in the app.